Our Work

The Regen10 Outcomes Framework is our foundational tool – a farmer-centric, globally co-developed reference for what regenerative agrifood systems can and should deliver across both farm and landscape levels. 

Developed through extensive consultations, dialogues, and trials, including farmers’ groups, Indigenous Peoples’ organizations, conservation bodies, civil society, and businesses, the Framework was released as a zero draft in December 2023. Since then, it has been tested and refined across diverse geographies to understand how farmers use it and what outcomes matter most in different contexts. 

The Framework serves two core purposes: 

As a shared vision – It helps actors across the food system align on regenerative ambition while retaining flexibility to adapt to local realities. Whether informing farmer decisions, guiding landscape transition planning, shaping investment and program strategies, or supporting food systems alignment, the Outcomes Framework provides common reference points without dictating practices or metrics. 

As a credibility reference – It enables evaluation of tools, standards, and claims against a holistic set of regenerative outcomes, supporting transparency and accountability across the ecosystem without enforcing compliance. 

The revised Framework will be publicly released in 2026, accompanied by guidance on how different actors can apply it to support regenerative and agroecological transitions in their contexts. 

Regen10 focuses on landscape partnerships as key drivers of the regenerative food systems transition. We’re co-developing strategies and tools to help strengthen, expand and multiply these collaborations in regions across the globe, leveraging the expertise of our partner 1000 Landscapes.  

Regenerative transitions require understanding not just desired outcomes, but the economic realities farmers face. Through Transition Pathways analyses across six landscapes producing the world’s most consumed foods, we’ve examined the costs, barriers, and enabling conditions for shifting from conventional to regenerative and agroecological approaches. 

These analyses, alongside our Cost-Benefit Methodology, help users model transition economics in their own contexts – making visible the upfront investments, yield implications, market access needs, and policy changes required to make regenerative agriculture economically viable for farmers. 

This evidence base grounds regenerative ambition in the practical realities of farmer livelihoods, informing what finance mechanisms, policy reforms, and business commitments are needed to enable transitions at scale.